From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: failing packages Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 22:34:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20151017203457.GA16824@debian> References: <20151006124812.3e2c2f3f@debian-netbook> <20151016201135.GA14772@debian> <20151016210206.GA23225@debian> <20151017105253.GA5054@thebird.nl> <20151017195605.GA16011@debian> <87io65gt2l.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnYCG-0004n9-0m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:35:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnYCC-0004ni-RQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:35:19 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:50391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnYCC-0004nW-Iy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:35:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87io65gt2l.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org There is a new version upstream (1.2.2); is it safe to try an update, or do the bioinformaticians need to keep the old version? Andreas