From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: failing packages Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:24:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20151017162409.GA8609@debian> References: <20151006124812.3e2c2f3f@debian-netbook> <20151016201135.GA14772@debian> <20151016210206.GA23225@debian> <87mvvhzzg7.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54159) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnUHO-000551-EG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:24:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnUHL-0003nx-C5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:24:22 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:54513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnUHL-0003nt-2T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:24:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mvvhzzg7.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > No. How about the attached patch? Much better, of course, thanks! Maybe upstream could be convinced to include some detection of the availability of sse. Andreas