* Building core-updates?
@ 2015-10-07 22:25 Ludovic Courtès
2015-10-08 4:54 ` Mark H Weaver
2015-10-08 8:09 ` Andreas Enge
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-10-07 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guix-devel
Hi,
‘core-updates’ provides the long awaited fix for locales, and it’s
essentially ready to merge.
We need to choose whether to revert 42e735d based on the discussion in
<http://bugs.gnu.org/21620>. Mark? Andreas?
Either way, we should start building all of the branch.
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Building core-updates?
2015-10-07 22:25 Building core-updates? Ludovic Courtès
@ 2015-10-08 4:54 ` Mark H Weaver
2015-10-08 7:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-10-08 8:09 ` Andreas Enge
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2015-10-08 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix-devel
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> ‘core-updates’ provides the long awaited fix for locales, and it’s
> essentially ready to merge.
>
> We need to choose whether to revert 42e735d based on the discussion in
> <http://bugs.gnu.org/21620>. Mark? Andreas?
I think we should leave 42e735d for now, until we understand what's
going on. We can revert it in the next core-updates cycle if it turns
out to be unneeded.
> Either way, we should start building all of the branch.
Agreed.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Building core-updates?
2015-10-08 4:54 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2015-10-08 7:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-10-08 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: Guix-devel
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> ‘core-updates’ provides the long awaited fix for locales, and it’s
>> essentially ready to merge.
>>
>> We need to choose whether to revert 42e735d based on the discussion in
>> <http://bugs.gnu.org/21620>. Mark? Andreas?
>
> I think we should leave 42e735d for now, until we understand what's
> going on. We can revert it in the next core-updates cycle if it turns
> out to be unneeded.
Yeah, makes sense.
>> Either way, we should start building all of the branch.
>
> Agreed.
I’ve enabled it now.
Thanks for your feedback,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Building core-updates?
2015-10-07 22:25 Building core-updates? Ludovic Courtès
2015-10-08 4:54 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2015-10-08 8:09 ` Andreas Enge
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2015-10-08 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix-devel
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:25:39AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> We need to choose whether to revert 42e735d based on the discussion in
> <http://bugs.gnu.org/21620>. Mark? Andreas?
Both is fine with me. I still do not quite understand what is happening,
but will reply to this effect on the bug.
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-08 8:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-07 22:25 Building core-updates? Ludovic Courtès
2015-10-08 4:54 ` Mark H Weaver
2015-10-08 7:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-10-08 8:09 ` Andreas Enge
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).