From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Building core-updates? Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:09:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20151008080953.GA4569@debian> References: <87612i1fks.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk6H8-0003L9-Ps for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 04:10:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk6H3-0002aW-8s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 04:10:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87612i1fks.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: Guix-devel On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:25:39AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > We need to choose whether to revert 42e735d based on the discussion in > . Mark? Andreas? Both is fine with me. I still do not quite understand what is happening, but will reply to this effect on the bug. Andreas