From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input. Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 23:45:20 +0300 Message-ID: <20151007234520.1501a4d0@debian-netbook> References: <20151007182229.7660.43511@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <874mi25sbf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/poZNuqYO7s4AowK8_c4s8Fa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zjvag-00076H-B4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:45:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zjvab-0002x1-2M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:45:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874mi25sbf.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/poZNuqYO7s4AowK8_c4s8Fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:36:52 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Efraim Flashner skribis: >=20 > > commit d04efa0fff908de0f8822a27582b4b1c3dcae553 > > Author: Efraim Flashner > > Date: Wed Oct 7 14:44:59 2015 +0300 > > > > gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input. > > =20 > > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (camlp4)[inputs]: Removed duplicate "ocaml" > > entry from native-inputs. > > --- > > gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 3 +-- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > > index fc45805..0302c85 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > > @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ Git-friendly development workflow.") > > "0icdfzhsbgf89925gc8gl3fm8z2xzszzlib0v9dj5wyzkyv3a342"= )) > > (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz")))) > > (build-system gnu-build-system) > > - (native-inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml) > > - ("which" ,which))) > > + (native-inputs `(("which" ,which))) > > (inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml))) >=20 > This was probably correct: When cross-compiling, you would both need the > compiler (in =E2=80=98native-inputs=E2=80=99) and the run-time support li= brary (thus in > =E2=80=98inputs=E2=80=99.) >=20 > Now, this is mostly theoretical in this case because it would probably > take more than this to cross-compile OCaml code. >=20 > Ludo=E2=80=99. Should I go ahead and revert the change? I was starting to work on getting opam to build and I noticed this. I suppose at a minimum it doesn't hurt to have it in native-inputs and in inputs, it just didn't look right. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/poZNuqYO7s4AowK8_c4s8Fa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWFYRgAAoJEPTB05F+rO6Tur4P/RrY3/YHZYlR7vTEOXGF9dMJ VHhJO8qn7ULBPtonJRjgvazlXRyl3YK9lvJToY65uJPJZviEjqe2ctOJUNvrvc87 vtVwIvtTqHrRzi5imdJe1D0ISzc+40Kdd6X0zvshI51K1TN8I/xL6+sgUL44zbQm ZMEwpVzME8idMzdfG52FlWc1gdZw49pMQBQcEAp2QZ4EE/Vi0sMZjYf/Lpz8td+r aC7OVZLDgm5OJUkwZ2WFFNnQeJC38U3PkQxlqpLuD2AecjY2fhkkOAKlvJ6MQCdH tGoOXUH7uIV5tqwspYA+MME1KtUrIBXAX1K1bGY4w6xaM+1QNtmMTQ9KqfAhYdEd nA/iBt18K/tP+GisWO1O2GnmRPVZZkvHv8NItP1L698Thi/kwIQmU5t6x52UKL89 kJEMPZM9g+660ZJKAPsk8DsMkJnb5wBYVynZ2y56aGFkzf8oY5qjUMkb/i5mWUj6 2U6iUArP6gjbE06KbuwHRohCrVKdCa1uGOUxjUszmrbGsH3j4P79ugFmwdUpJAQv SUS3Dss0pn+fNZL1H1bzm2/AJXzaba/dtJV+Seb+Mh2QP9qnil0p7wM74/VxOAgU 92MHrPVaBg44BOo9Ud6iBxnc3UDtbaHKJhkuY/jNo9+IrsRsYfQAz8gQmGJb9Avw fdWLcbsF3L9h5Tfw5w0M =HBAw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/poZNuqYO7s4AowK8_c4s8Fa--