From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input.
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 23:45:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151007234520.1501a4d0@debian-netbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874mi25sbf.fsf@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1927 bytes --]
On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:36:52 +0200
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
>
> > commit d04efa0fff908de0f8822a27582b4b1c3dcae553
> > Author: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
> > Date: Wed Oct 7 14:44:59 2015 +0300
> >
> > gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (camlp4)[inputs]: Removed duplicate "ocaml"
> > entry from native-inputs.
> > ---
> > gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 3 +--
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
> > index fc45805..0302c85 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
> > @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ Git-friendly development workflow.")
> > "0icdfzhsbgf89925gc8gl3fm8z2xzszzlib0v9dj5wyzkyv3a342"))
> > (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))))
> > (build-system gnu-build-system)
> > - (native-inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml)
> > - ("which" ,which)))
> > + (native-inputs `(("which" ,which)))
> > (inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml)))
>
> This was probably correct: When cross-compiling, you would both need the
> compiler (in ‘native-inputs’) and the run-time support library (thus in
> ‘inputs’.)
>
> Now, this is mostly theoretical in this case because it would probably
> take more than this to cross-compile OCaml code.
>
> Ludo’.
Should I go ahead and revert the change? I was starting to work on getting
opam to build and I noticed this. I suppose at a minimum it doesn't hurt to
have it in native-inputs and in inputs, it just didn't look right.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20151007182229.7660.43511@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <E1ZjtME-00020e-Ey@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
2015-10-07 20:36 ` 02/02: gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input Ludovic Courtès
2015-10-07 20:45 ` Efraim Flashner [this message]
2015-10-08 7:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151007234520.1501a4d0@debian-netbook \
--to=efraim@flashner.co.il \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).