From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] gnu: powertop: Update to 2.7. Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:31:29 +0300 Message-ID: <20151001133129.1fb2cb5e@debian-netbook> References: <1443635808-18649-1-git-send-email-efraim@flashner.co.il> <1443635808-18649-9-git-send-email-efraim@flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/wzJJdHPLsmabMfvuD_mEWjZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhb9G-0002bH-Q6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:31:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhb9C-0001MS-Qq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:31:38 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:43995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhb9C-0001MK-Kg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:31:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/wzJJdHPLsmabMfvuD_mEWjZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:14:55 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hi Efraim, >=20 > > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (powertop): Update to 2.7. > > [arguments]: Add "pciutils" to inputs. >=20 > This should be >=20 > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (powertop): Update to 2.7. > [inputs]: Add "pciutils". >=20 > Is =E2=80=9Cpciutils=E2=80=9D necessary for the update? If it isn=E2=80= =99t maybe it would be > better to split this into two commits, as these are unrelated changes. >=20 > ~~ Ricardo pciutils isn't necessary for the update. I saw that there was the to-do item for adding it, and I didn't run into any problems when building and testing with it added. It seemed like a small change so I threw it in with the version bump. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/wzJJdHPLsmabMfvuD_mEWjZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWDQuCAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TDJ8P/0hUq9mQm1WtQfX04wxFNVCY pBBQPwUl51vq2n8gFmaiIILqbhT5V6G/VCEqtqYWgB0EIgtB3Cs5LKXgY7S3Q/Cf PF3IexFKP4xWNKCiU/73c6dVoEdCKvQcuQuKoQtGTFtW332f2hxvxbot3vaJBIKX FWkt2QTPpPpvHgFvI7aeiVx8nQxX6qT1Z4XuBVXZycDyhUPNW48+vopdjkyKHH1E F/5dVlCl1F6mnC9+X0Bijpt+DGmY1glkzM7Etoz1oO2l+l5oqTUheAjbaCSIIBmL AbAgrHcWnrhJMSJdYVe9u5RnN8RSthBthJusXgevKu43oRnMuzl44g54hadI3HmN BWvjfp481MZ4SJXZK/izY37Koq+Dwi3O0ykf3d5K1iQtk7loK141cAyDyHQiEr/u /25q+bM+OJ7RH2nBxm0GfUEkGtUhyCHdMwpTFwgI3sKLgrbF5p9Uh0IBxQOBfXfH GMjpC3vJw7udy7lvv72kNBUdX4bO49mTF0kfDaYkmHP9HLw4s+wKIE1P4RqOuwpf BxhXx5cQkFE5+3p1uCXvD7jysMU/b+5UTNG+uxVhUTL6yeMNsLFr7HkDq0RmRDC6 VQrT05yHkRQ7t/EUl5sFvuVPp27N6vXaMUHVzoFK7fjR3EPtR5xGk1+akM0ik6aY VoWFSAymfmWuNZIBLZiX =nSUF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wzJJdHPLsmabMfvuD_mEWjZ--