From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update IcedTea. Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 11:15:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20150907091522.GA6670@debian> References: <20150722173356.GA10681@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51305) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYsWP-0002A0-Mg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 05:15:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYsWM-0007H1-4i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 05:15:29 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:55662) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYsWL-0007Gv-R9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 05:15:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150722173356.GA10681@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 'Guix-devel' Hi Ricardo, do you have an answer to the question below? On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 07:33:56PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > > I would also like to suggest changing the names ‘icedtea6’ and > > ‘icedtea7’ to just ‘icedtea’. They cannot be installed into the same > > profile anyway and users will most likely want the latest version by > > default. > > These version numbers are anyway a bit confusing... > > Is there a reason to keep icedtea6 around at all? If not, you might drop it > and rename icedtea7 as icedtea. Andreas