From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Circular dependency with geeqie
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 18:18:27 +0200
Message-ID: <20150905161827.GA18722@debian>
References: <20150904192902.GA2608@debian>
 <87twr92nu7.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44013)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZYGAq-0006GK-1X
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 12:18:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZYGAl-00052G-ME
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 12:18:40 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:59746)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZYGAl-000526-Bf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 12:18:35 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87twr92nu7.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 11:54:59AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I noticed the same and removed the ‘#:select’ part to make it work for
> me.  Why would a #:prefix be required?

Good question - I just thought the #:select was there for a reason, like
avoiding a clash of variable names. This does not seem to be the case;
I just followed your suggestion, and things work. I will commit this
modification.

Thanks!

Andreas