From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: New =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_graph?= =?utf-8?B?4oCZ?= command Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20150904081301.GA14870@thebird.nl> References: <87io8164s0.fsf@gnu.org> <20150903203232.GA25036@debian> <878u8n1b9u.fsf@gnu.org> <774083cc97244ca8abd19f56733239f2@exchsrv2.sgc.loc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXm99-0003jG-41 for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 04:14:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXm95-0000ZB-Th for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 04:14:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <774083cc97244ca8abd19f56733239f2@exchsrv2.sgc.loc> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Cook, Malcolm" Cc: Guix-devel Maybe we should have both. I like the current version because it reads logically from a *users* perspective. E.g. http://dthompson.us/images/guix/ruby-pg-graph.png ruby-pg depends on postgresql 9.3.8, depends on zlib 1.2.7. Logical. Pj. On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 08:55:46PM +0000, Cook, Malcolm wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I like the request. >=20 > I think the dependent packages should be pointed to. >=20 > In this way, each node in the graph and its outgoing arrows reflect the= contents of a single package. >=20 > ~Malco >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: guix-devel-bounces+mec=3Dstowers.org@gnu.org [mailto:guix-deve= l- > > bounces+mec=3Dstowers.org@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ludovic Court=C3=A8s > > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 3:47 PM > > To: Andreas Enge > > Cc: Guix-devel > > Subject: Re: New =E2=80=98guix graph=E2=80=99 command > >=20 > > Hey! > >=20 > > Andreas Enge skribis: > >=20 > > > Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be prefer= able > > > if the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent pack= ages? > >=20 > > Dunno, maybe the graph people would choose the other direction but I= like it > > this way, looks more =E2=80=9Cintuitive=E2=80=9D to me. What do peo= ple think? > >=20 > > Ludo=E2=80=99. >=20 --=20