From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: New =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_graph?= =?utf-8?B?4oCZ?= command Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:32:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20150903203232.GA25036@debian> References: <87io8164s0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXbBc-0004qQ-7S for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:32:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXbBb-0008Ib-G6 for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:32:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87io8164s0.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: Guix-devel Hello! On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:53:03AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Here’s a long overdue ‘guix graph’ command (documentation below.) > Comments welcome! Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable if the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent packages? Andreas