From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update IcedTea. Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20150722173356.GA10681@debian> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHxu8-0005rj-8P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:34:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHxu3-0008WU-Dk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:34:04 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:60129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHxu3-0008Tq-4s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:33:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 'Guix-devel' On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Attached is a patch to move our ‘icedtea7’ package to the 2.6.x series > (the 2.5.x series will only get one more release). The patch looks good to me. > I would also like to suggest changing the names ‘icedtea6’ and > ‘icedtea7’ to just ‘icedtea’. They cannot be installed into the same > profile anyway and users will most likely want the latest version by > default. These version numbers are anyway a bit confusing... Is there a reason to keep icedtea6 around at all? If not, you might drop it and rename icedtea7 as icedtea. Andreas