From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0. Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:32:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20150711083202.GA6442@debian> References: <20150708211909.12880.83730@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87mvz6kzw6.fsf@netris.org> <87a8v5ng8o.fsf@netris.org> <20150709231755.GA16506@debian> <87mvz4lzuf.fsf@netris.org> <20150710192556.GA3066@debian> <87io9rn5jt.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDqDH-0006of-71 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 04:32:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDqDD-0006sQ-Vf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 04:32:47 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:56747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDqDD-0006sI-Ko for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 04:32:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87io9rn5jt.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Mark, On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:03:50PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Can we do this on core-updates instead? I'm currently working on a > core-updates branch. I will push it soon, after I've done some basic > testing on it. I would prefer a separate branch - with hydra lagging behind, we tend to build only the core packages on core-updates, so I think we would not even see the result of a boost update. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 05:28:10PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > I would also prefer to prioritize getting this openssl security fix > deployed, if you don't mind. Toward that end, I'm going to delete the > jobset on Hydra for now. If you disagree, can we talk about it? No problem; I was just in a hurry because I am leaving for a week. I just created a clean wip-boost branch with the two commits (boost update and patch) applied on top of the current master. Once openssl-update has built, could you please rebase wip-boost and try to have it built on hydra? Thanks a lot! Andreas