From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] gnu: Add deal.II. Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:09:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20150628210949.GA8410@debian> References: <1435463151-32099-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org> <1435463151-32099-15-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org> <87lhf3twfn.fsf@gnu.org> <20150628110535.42177fd6@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9Jpv-0005o5-TG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:10:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9Jpu-0007Jp-5j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:09:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150628110535.42177fd6@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Eric Bavier On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:05:35AM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: > I would prefer to keep "deal.II" for the name at least, because that it > the software's declared name, despite the domain and tarball being > "dealii". Are there arguments against it? The package naming conventions. We always transform to lowercase, and replace special characters by "-". So both "dealii" (as the tarball name) and "deal-ii" (transformation of the project name) would be fine. Andreas