From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: dbus-glib: Propagate inputs dbus and glib. Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 22:14:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20150524201440.GA7409@debian> References: <20150523153249.19884.3207@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87zj4ulw8g.fsf@netris.org> <20150524073431.GA3725@debian> <87382m86c6.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhge11we.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwcIO-0006b3-QD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 16:14:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwcIK-0005dh-TQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 16:14:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lhge11we.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:33:05AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > Should we revert that part of the commit, at least for packages for > > which we don’t know? > FWIW, I don't feel the need to revert, especially since it would entail > more rebuilding, but in the future I would prefer to use the more > conservative approach that you outlined above. Okay, both are fine with me. > I don't think we should spend a lot of time on this, but to the extent > we are aware of which inputs are directly needed by a given package, I > think we should aim to include all directly used inputs, as opposed to > aiming to remove inputs whenever they are propagated by something else. Also okay then. It also saves quite some time... Andreas