From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= Subject: Re: Bumping the Guile version requirement Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 10:31:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20150508083124.GB1683@venom.lan> References: <20150430074219.GA572@jocasta.intra> <87r3r1dzra.fsf@gnu.org> <20150501151439.GA8466@intra> <874mnqwzb7.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhh0pe2v.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yqdgx-0001id-0A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 04:31:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yqdgs-0000vA-Tg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 04:31:30 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40553 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yqdgs-0000tM-Nh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 04:31:26 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D342AAC7 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 08:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lhh0pe2v.fsf_-_@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: >ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) skribis: > >> You should be able to get compilation going with the patch below, but >> getting the HTTP client to work with 2.0.5 will require more work. > >I think for 0.8.2 I will actually bump the requirement to Guile 2.0.7 or >2.0.9 (the latter is what Debian 8 has.) People on older systems will >still be able to install Guix using the binary tarball. > >What do people think? No objections with my openSUSE or Gentoo packagers hat. S_W --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlVMdFkACgkQ37XrCapiVCPn6wCcCgl2hM58pV34ABy0NV72xedt iMYAn0hh8fitbmysXx+93+vNTzoHI2m9 =9LUH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip--