From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Biopython. Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:00:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20150416090030.GA18083@debian> References: <87618xyxmq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YiffA-0007TH-Cr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 05:00:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yiff7-00022Q-40 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 05:00:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Guix-devel On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:46:11AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > http://www.biopython.org/DIST/LICENSE It starts like this: "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation with or without modifications and for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted" Does the provision "without fee" make it non-free? Otherwise, I think you could use "non-copyleft" (which takes additional arguments just like "x11-style"). Andreas