From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= <sleep_walker@gnu.org>
Subject: reproducible builds and debugging information
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:26:32 +0100
Message-ID: <20150322172632.GB3826@venom>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42116)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tcech@suse.de>) id 1YZjdz-0000AK-Fd
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:26:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tcech@suse.de>) id 1YZjdu-0004Yd-CR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:26:35 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40625 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tcech@suse.de>) id 1YZjdu-0004YW-6v
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:26:30 -0400
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])
	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F3CAD25
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: guix-devel@gnu.org


--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline

Hello Guix!

I have question about reproducible builds and generating debugging
information.

As I was tracing curl code, I needed to rebuild the package with
"-ggdb" in CFLAGS and enable debug among outputs.

The later doesn't change the hash (and the generated code), but the
first does. So I'd like to propose to put "-ggdb" to generally applied
CFLAGS for whole distribution. I don't know if it will cause any
performance penalty, but it would be possible to not only have
reproducible builds but also inspect them and debug them...

Without it it can be hard to analyze core dumps and trace.

WDYT?

S_W

--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlUO+0YACgkQ37XrCapiVCPivQCeKKnL6dSxBjlFuKimXMtoKN47
NUAAoLF1n1QoiYu5efclTtGzPUbYX3jR
=DbiE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5--