From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gnu: Add taskwarrior. Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 21:00:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20150313200021.GB2680@venom> References: <1426208221-17839-1-git-send-email-sleep_walker@suse.cz> <1426208221-17839-2-git-send-email-sleep_walker@suse.cz> <30562f22382a1ca7c1db98eac00abbb9@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWVky-0001ci-Ej for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:00:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWVku-0007qs-Vh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:00:28 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41595 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWVku-0007pW-Q4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:00:24 -0400 Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC36DAB09 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <30562f22382a1ca7c1db98eac00abbb9@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you for your review. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:16:00PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: >On 2015-03-12 19:57, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech wrote: >>* gnu/packages/task.scm: New file. >>* gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add new file here. >>--- >> gnu-system.am | 1 + >> gnu/packages/task.scm | 68=20 >>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >[...] >>+ (inputs >>+ `(("util-linux" ,util-linux) >>+ ("gnutls" ,gnutls) >>+ ("lua" ,lua) >>+ ("coreutils" ,coreutils))) > >Can coreutils be left out here, since it is an implicit input? OK, I will omit it. > >>+ ;; Taskwarrior is licensed under MIT license, which is=20 >>identical to >>+ ;; Expat License >>+ (license license:expat))) > >Is it actually the Expat license, or the X11 license, which is also >sometimes called the "MIT license"? In either case, I would perhaps=20 >put quotation marks around "MIT license" to indicate the ambiguity. I did comparison and it is Expat license as intended in (guix licenses). X11 license has aditional paragraph on use of trademarks. You can have a look here to make your opinion: https://git.tasktools.org/projects/TM/repos/task/browse/COPYING I'm not lawyer and I don't feel like authority in this area but 1] I believe that intention of authors is obvious with the URL in the end of file. They choose MIT as their license, they used opensource.org license list to express their will. And I respect their choice. 2] MIT license is also recognized by spdx.org https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT In my experience openSUSE, Gentoo uses the same license name, Debian at least mentions Expat (https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit). So I'd rather not put quotation marks around "MIT license". I'd even like to have MIT license as alias or separate license. Best regards, S_W --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEUEARECAAYFAlUDQdMACgkQ37XrCapiVCNWdwCUCY8/pkE5FY1wJNtl995CrFLU RQCeK2Bqq5jJTO6LpL9WIJ+piMyA7n8= =dcF3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--