From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= Subject: Re: update of openconnect Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:10:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20150313151038.GA20299@crashnator.suse.cz> References: <1426204535-8877-1-git-send-email-sleep_walker@suse.cz> <20150313103522.GA8508@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWREa-00080y-0Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:10:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWREW-00046w-OR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:10:43 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54046 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWREW-00046L-7o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:10:40 -0400 Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF80AB09 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150313103522.GA8508@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:35:22AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: >On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:55:34AM +0100, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech wrote: >> It seems that openssl version is from openconnect POV broken and as they >> recommended to switch to gnutls I did the change. >> Is anyone against this change? > >I have just tried your patch with the new version of openconnect, and it w= orks >for me. Have you checked the pgp signature against the downloaded tarball? >If yes, please push. I have verified that downloaded tarball is signed by the key mentioned on t= he web and that the key is signed by 341 to me unknown signatures. I can't do better, sorry. S_W --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlUC/ewACgkQ37XrCapiVCM8CgCgxsK+2axpkfrfax32Piv1O3Mw qK8An2RaIyjAAr+4IsEIYV51WGmV0VMx =/3jK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--