From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: gnu: Add CLISP. Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:20:52 -0600 Message-ID: <20150212212052.687467f1@PocketWee> References: <87lhk2eloq.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YM6nh-0004nm-K4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:20:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YM6nc-0004MP-Js for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:20:17 -0500 Received: from mail.centurylink.net ([205.219.233.9]:23272 helo=smtp.centurylink.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YM6nc-0004ML-Eb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:20:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lhk2eloq.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Taylan Ulrich =?UTF-8?B?QmF5xLFybMSxL0thbW1l?= =?UTF-8?B?cg==?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:48:05 +0100 taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer) wrote: > From 6201470b3e6c2410be7f38d8cc1cc99c3b13f0da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =3D?UTF-8?q?Taylan=3D20Ulrich=3D20Bay=3DC4=3DB1rl=3DC4=3DB1/Kammer?= =3D > > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:19:52 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add CLISP. >=20 > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (clisp): New variable. [...] > + (arguments > + '(#:phases > + (alist-cons-after > + 'unpack 'post-unpack Could you use a more descriptive phase name? E.g. "patch-sh-and-pwd"? > + (alist-cons-before > + 'build 'pre-build Ditto. Several other packages use "chdir" or "chdir-to-source" > + ;; Parallel builds seem to fail. > + #:parallel-build? #f)) If you know more specifically why parallel builds fail, could you comment on that? Race conditions, or not using $(MAKE), etc? > + (home-page "http://www.clisp.org/") > + (synopsis "A feature-rich Common Lisp implementation") Do not begin with "A"; `guix lint` will complain about that. Perhaps just "Common Lisp implementation". > + (description "GNU CLISP is an implementation of ANSI Common > Lisp, with +many extensions. It includes an interpreter, compiler, ^ "+many" -> "many" > debugger, CLOS, MOP, +an FFI, i18n, POSIX and Perl regular ^ "+an" -> "an" > expressions, a socket interface, fast +bignums, arbitrary precision ^ "+bignums" -> "bignums" > floats, and more. An X11 interface is available +through CLX, Garnet ^ "+through" -> "through" > and CLUE/CLIO. Command line editing is provided by +readline.") ^ "+readline" -> "readline" Copy and paste + wrapping errors? ;) > + ;; Website says gpl2+, COPYRIGHT file says gpl2; actual source > files have > + ;; a lot of gpl3+. (Also some parts are under non-copyleft > licenses, such > + ;; as CLX by Texas Instruments.) > + (license (list license:gpl2 license:gpl2+ license:gpl3+)))) I think in this case the gpl3+ might "win out", but I'll let others comment on that. Thanks! `~Eric