From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Netpbm Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:01:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20150125210125.GA1913@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFUJK-0006gQ-GD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:01:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFUJH-0001nX-BN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:01:34 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:63946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFUJH-0001n8-1S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:01:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org I just went back to our previous netpbm version, as the newest one fails one test. Apparently I committed a change instead of stashing it, so I did not test it correctly locally. Sorry for the mess! Andreas