From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: succeeding job marked as failed Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:34:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20150124163427.GA10599@debian> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YF3fV-0001a4-V5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:34:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YF3fQ-0000Hl-0y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:34:39 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:53062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YF3fP-0000HZ-OJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:34:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Federico Beffa Cc: Guix-devel On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 04:59:31PM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote: > The following job, according to the log, appears to have succeeded. In > spite of this it is listed under failed jobs. > http://hydra.gnu.org/build/216896 > I'm wondering about the reason. I do not know the exact reason. Maybe the transfer of the result from the build machine back to hydra failed? In any case, we regularly have such builds. I just restarted it. Often it then succeeds immediately (after waiting through its queue, that is). Andreas