From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: gobject-introspection typelibs and shared libraries Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:16:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20150118131619.GA15180@debian> References: <20150117120244.GA8583@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42901) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCpiO-0000wq-ER for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:16:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCpiL-00082u-8Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:16:28 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Federico Beffa Cc: Guix-devel On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:39:52AM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > > would also be okay. But if we go for the latter, I think you should bring > > it up with the gcc project first. > I expressed my opinion on this here > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-01/msg00230.html Yes, that was a good point (which crossed my message). Andreas