From: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add bedtools
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:15:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141216101545.GA4824@intra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <idj61db7vu0.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2171 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:06:15AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
John Darrington writes:
> I suggest that in the description and particularly in the synopsis fields you
> avoid persiflage like "swiss-army knife". It doesn't add any information, and
> only goes to increase the noise.
>
> (The same goes for phrases such as "high quality", "powerful" and "state of the art").
>
> J'
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 05:37:16PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bedtools): New variable.
>
> + (synopsis "Swiss army knife for genome arithmetic")
> + (description
> + "Collectively, the bedtools utilities are a swiss-army knife of tools for
> +a wide-range of genomics analysis tasks. The most widely-used tools enable
> +genome arithmetic: that is, set theory on the genome. For example, bedtools
> +allows one to intersect, merge, count, complement, and shuffle genomic
> +intervals from multiple files in widely-used genomic file formats such as BAM,
> +BED, GFF/GTF, VCF.")
I do agree. I sheepishly copied the synopsis and description from the
project website and I wasn't quite satisfied either. Do you have a
suggestion? "Tools for performing genome arithmetic", maybe?
Without knowing the package I cannot say. But I presume that "Swiss Army Knife" is supposed
to imply that there are various tools of differing purposes.
So perhaps "Miscellaneous tools for performing genome arithmetic"? On the
other hand, unless there is some other package which contains some specialised tools for one
special branch of genome arithmetic, then the word "miscellaneous" is redundant and simply
"Tools for performing genome arithmetic" like you suggested would be best. It is short and
to the point as the synopsis should be.
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20141215155541.GA19757@jocasta.intra>
[not found] ` <idj61db7vu0.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
2014-12-16 10:15 ` John Darrington [this message]
2014-12-12 10:11 [PATCH] gnu: Add bedtools Ricardo Wurmus
2014-12-12 23:00 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-12-13 6:42 ` Mark H Weaver
2014-12-15 15:46 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2014-12-16 17:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141216101545.GA4824@intra \
--to=john@darrington.wattle.id.au \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).