From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Libreoffice building (sort of) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:19:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20141124171933.GA8722@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsxIi-0006GK-JW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:19:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsxIe-0008EQ-50 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:19:48 -0500 Received: from de.cellform.com ([88.217.224.109]:56818 helo=jocasta.intra) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsxId-0008Cy-Hf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:19:43 -0500 Received: from jocasta.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jocasta.intra (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id sAOHJXWm008783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:19:33 +0100 Received: (from john@localhost) by jocasta.intra (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id sAOHJX9C008782 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:19:33 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well currently the libreoffice package in wip-libreoffice branch, builds, i= nstalls and=20 seems to work ok. Slightly worrying is that the first few builds crashed in one of LO's unitt= ests. I added the line (setenv "CPPUNITTRACE" "gdb --args") which I expected just to give= me a backtrace to help me diagnose the problem. I was very surprised doing this, caused t= he package to=20 build, test and install without error! -- A Heisenbug. Anyway, like I say, the package works, but is a bit rough. I suggest tha= t some of the dependencies are tidied up, reviewed and pushed to master, and the deeper = issues investigated later. Help doing this is welcome. J' --=20 PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlRzaKUACgkQimdxnC3oJ7P44ACfWlwSVWEh1DbCB9h7m9Z4SddF pOAAn2Z8ZVS9CAaGbUvAA/FPZRXSMnGf =JyOw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--