From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruno =?UTF-8?B?RsOpbGl4?= Rezende Ribeiro Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Wine. Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:05:58 -0200 Message-ID: <20141115130558.67cbfa45@freedom-laptop> References: <1416062479-26430-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com> <20141115144501.GA12614@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/h9ovUFPj7/j5Rn/MDwltH0T"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpew2-0007ij-UH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:06:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpevw-0002wu-PL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:06:46 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpevw-0002wq-MD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:06:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141115144501.GA12614@jocasta.intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, ????????? --Sig_/h9ovUFPj7/j5Rn/MDwltH0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Em Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:45:01 +0100 John Darrington escreveu: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:41:19PM +0800, ????????? wrote: >=20 > + "Wine (originally an acronym for \"Wine Is Not an > Emulator\") is a +compatibility layer capable of running Windows > applications on several +POSIX-compliant operating systems, such as > Linux,=20 >=20 > "Linux" is not an operating system. On the other hand, GNU can be regarded as a POSIX-compliant operating system. By the way, what's the Guix packaging policy about "GNU" vs "GNU+Linux" vs "GNU+Linux-libre" vs "Linux" nomenclature in package descriptions? Exceptional cases aside, I think the healthiest way is to make every reference go to "GNU" alone. --=20 ,=3D ,-_-. =3D. Bruno F=C3=A9lix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF] ((_/)o o(\_)) There is no system but GNU; `-'(. .)`-' GNU Linux-Libre is one of its official kernels; \_/ All software must be free as in freedom; --Sig_/h9ovUFPj7/j5Rn/MDwltH0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUZ2v1AAoJECe5xv0o1hivSM8IAIGOFbwQMuN5erBmoxg28pHW ML0RLAmVtkHb7lhI/LzkJciGnU7LnDSnYIC9IBAFlZ2kphbq/1zpb+V8sgxTBU7n jzE/GQbvDjD0yyUMy0UbeHaW2inIe70+N5VX2lBuvjias6wYo9MGsq/g45Pfu0cY pkGrMOyYkBtFymd+HLhQ/gchues1hZ+MbsQtsXo8uWfc896nlKZRLASY/+nwFYKt S100zBSxldvGv10UbejjJzqoiXKwIgqdWTSR/bcGo53CgMKASW1SCUXNiKluj3ms w6u4BSFrPxxTLf+Lf1Bh0LU5zgnhqn83d/x3nqh50yfJVSMXSzbQkBzzea5fhsU= =6oAB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/h9ovUFPj7/j5Rn/MDwltH0T--