From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sane-backends Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 20:36:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20141019183657.GA14491@jocasta.intra> References: <87k33wz8nj.fsf@gnu.org> <1413726820-13664-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> <87y4scx8cj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfvM2-0002eb-BV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:37:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfvLy-0007mX-7i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:37:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y4scx8cj.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic Court??s Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 07:44:28PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: John Darrington skribis: =20 > + ;; It would seem that tests are not maintained - fails with > + ;; the following: > + ;; > + ;; < This page was last updated on Wed Jul 31 07:52:48 2013 > + ;; < by sane-desc 3.5 from sane-backends 1.0.24git > + ;; --- > + ;; > This page was last updated on Sun Oct 19 15:41:39 2014 > + ;; > by sane-desc 3.5 from sane-backends 1.0.24 > + ;; **** File generated for html-backends-split mode is differen= t from reference > + ;; Makefile:501: recipe for target 'check.local' failed =20 Perhaps it would be worth trying to s/24git/24/ and see if it works. WDYT? =20 Well presumably the date would have to be substituted too. I wonder how much it is wise to second guess what the developers wanted. P= resumably=20 upstream haven't run "make check" since Jul 31 2013, so it seems that they = don't consider it important. J' =20 --=20 PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlREBMkACgkQimdxnC3oJ7M/fgCeMisL78eBz/LLX6gu5fOmTdFO SH0AnjrBig+3QbCU8j5TCd0L8VHa/qN1 =5qR1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--