From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add xboing
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:54:01 +0200
Message-ID: <20141013145401.GA16600@jocasta.intra>
References: <1413196628-2461-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org>
	<87wq84cfy3.fsf@gnu.org> <20141013124302.GA11097@jocasta.intra>
	<87fvescbx1.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56637)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1Xdh0u-0005wp-I1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:54:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1Xdh0q-0008TZ-3Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:54:20 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87fvescbx1.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic Court??s <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington <jmd@gnu.org>

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 03:54:50PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
     
     Emacs 23+ loads it automatically.  Otherwise, drop:
     
       (setq indent-tabs-mode nil)
     
     somewhere in ~/.emacs.

Thanks!

But it still tends to format
  (arguments
     `(#:tests? #f
       #:phases

as

  (arguments
     `(#:tests? #f
                #:phases




     > It is neither of those, although similar.  The trouble is, I don't think that 
     > there is a URI for the license.  It is contained in the tarball.
     
     See other uses: it???s fine to use file://COPYING, say, as the URI to the
     license, if the only copy is within the tarball.

ok.
     
     Also, it???s even better if you can add a comment above saying what???s
     different from the X11 license text.

I will try.  But it is difficult to say what is different without just giving the output
from diff.


J'

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.