From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add giblib. Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:47:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20140925124726.GB7749@debian> References: <87vboccc7i.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX8SV-0001bC-9B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:47:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX8SN-0001wW-Qe for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:47:43 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:60489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX8SN-0001vy-GP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:47:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vboccc7i.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:54:09PM +0400, Alex Kost wrote: > COPYING is also attached. This is x11 (without the clause that the name of the X Consortium shall not be used; I think we could still keep x11 and not use x11-style, as it is clear that the X Consortium clause has no effect when the software is not written by the X Consortium). Andreas