From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add imlib2. Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:44:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20140925124413.GA7749@debian> References: <87wq8scc81.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX8PO-0001HO-Lx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:44:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX8PI-0001Gu-J2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:44:30 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:62755) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX8PI-0001FX-9V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:44:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wq8scc81.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:53:50PM +0400, Alex Kost wrote: > All 3 packages have some custom licenses, so I used "bsd-style", but I'm > not sure about it. Along with the patch, I'm attaching "COPYING". What > license it is? Whenever I read "deal in the software without restriction", I think of x.org, which I packaged. So this looks like the x11 license: http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:X11 This license adds more sentences, from the second sentence of the second paragraph on: "In addition publicly documented acknowledgment must be given that this software has been used...". So I suppose you should use x11-style. Andreas