From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Hydra time out
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 23:22:12 +0200
Message-ID: <20140604212212.GA2429@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45888)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1WsIdc-0000SQ-Dq
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:22:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1WsIdU-0002Mv-Je
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:22:24 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:50857)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1WsIdU-0002Ma-4l
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:22:16 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

gcc-objc++-4.8.2.mips64el-linux fails to be built because of:

building of `/gnu/store/avdn8phqm44v33p6k42pipybcgjs92mb-gcc-objc++-4.8.2.drv' timed out after 72000 seconds
@ build-failed /gnu/store/avdn8phqm44v33p6k42pipybcgjs92mb-gcc-objc++-4.8.2.drv - timeout

I think it simply takes more than 12 hours...

Do you think there might be a way of compiling all gcc languages in one go
instead of in several packages? Maybe enable all languages in gcc? Or would
this create too big a gcc package? Also, maybe we could drop one of the three
gcc versions.

And finally, why are there two gcc-4.8.2 packages, and where are they actually?
$ guix package -A gcc
gcc     4.7.3   out     gnu/packages/gcc.scm:95:4
gcc     4.8.2   out     gnu/packages/gcc.scm:95:4
gcc     4.9.0   out     gnu/packages/gcc.scm:95:4
gcc     4.8.2   out     gnu/packages/gcc.scm:95:4

Is there a way of printing not the line 95 in which the base gcc package is
defined from which all others inherit, but the line where the actual package
is defined?

Andreas