From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libpetsc Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 20:20:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20140501182024.GA22427@debian> References: <87eh0emy00.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqe64ibm.fsf@gnu.org> <8761lpmpmf.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wfvb5-00059i-IP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 May 2014 14:20:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wfvay-0000YT-2a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 May 2014 14:20:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8761lpmpmf.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:26:48AM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: > I was originally thinking "petsc" but then discovered that the package > name on many other distributions is "libpetsc". I would personally > prefer "petsc". Our general rule is to use the upstream name (less need to think!), while I think other distributions often add "lib" for packages that do not contain executables. Andreas