From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Rename oggvorbis.scm to xiph-codecs.scm? (was Re: New package
	recipe: libopus-1.1)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:12:50 +0100
Message-ID: <20140123181250.GA20809@debian>
References: <52DFE285.2010206@totakura.in> <52DFE3DD.1020005@gmail.com>
	<52DFED9F.1050404@totakura.in> <20140122205933.GA30625@debian>
	<87lhy6lmva.fsf_-_@netris.org> <87txcubq10.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJ=RwfaA3SULzt2KLNJ1ABxc7somzx8=oM7mjJGhHZ=Avx-NtA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55793)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1W6Om7-0007gw-DC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:13:17 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1W6Om0-0004IW-Tv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:13:11 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ=RwfaA3SULzt2KLNJ1ABxc7somzx8=oM7mjJGhHZ=Avx-NtA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:58:43AM -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Or just xiph.scm?  Because not everything is a codec strictly speaking.
> I like this name best.

Done in 54ff0b7. Please correct any errors you find... (As I just restarted
hydra and it needs to catch up building core-updates, I tested only that guix
still compiles.)

Andreas