From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs?= Batlle i Rossell Subject: Re: MIPS64/N64 support Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:56:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20131001115624.GA1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> References: <87fvsmgtsm.fsf@gnu.org> <87mwmuhtb3.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001070942.GV1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> <87li2dv3bz.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001080318.GW1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> <87ob79e5eu.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001093009.GX1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> <87zjqtb90x.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001100420.GZ1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> <87vc1hutak.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQyZ9-0007qP-L9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:56:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQyZ3-0004Kx-Fd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:56:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vc1hutak.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:25:39PM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Llu=EDs Batlle i Rossell skribis: >=20 > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:06:06PM +0400, Nikita Karetnikov wrote: > >> > I also seem to recall that gNewSense had only o32 support, years > >> > ago. And not any n32/n64. Can it be? > >>=20 > >> I think this is correct. > >>=20 > >> > I'd simply try to avoid ext4 or even ext3, without changing the ke= rnel. I don't > >> > know of linux-libre, but you need something newer than 3.7 I think= , to get the > >> > ext* fix. > >>=20 > >> OK, what do you recommend: Ext2 or something else? > > > > In theory, anything should work. :) > > I'd personally go for reiserfs or jfs. >=20 > Llu=EDs is an ext[234] skeptic, so take it with a grain of salt. ;-) Hey, I pushed hard to get the fix of ext4 upstream. I even had a temporar= y patch in nixpkgs to keep using ext4. :) > More importantly: Llu=EDs, is there a Linux configuration option to ena= ble > n64 support? How does that work? I think there is a simple option in the kernel to enable. I can't recall = what it is exactly.