From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Gtk+ 3 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:24:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20131001112428.GA7062@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52433) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQy4I-0006fS-6e for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:24:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQy4A-000513-SK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:24:42 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:59374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQy4A-00050v-JL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:24:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, packaging of gtk+-3.10.0 is making progress. It compiles, and I think only a few tests reading in /etc need to be disabled. After that, to be in line with our general policy of trying to use the latest versions of software, I think we should rename the variable gtk+ to gtk+-2, and call gtk+ the version 3.10.0. Then all packages requiring gtk+ will be recompiled using 3.10.0; if this fails, we will need to adapt the package inputs. What do you think? Andreas