From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Packages with libraries and binaries
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 14:06:24 +0200
Message-ID: <20130922120624.GA4534@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51865)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1VNiQt-0006ct-Ih
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 08:06:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1VNiQm-0006Vr-84
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 08:06:35 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:55536)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1VNiQl-0006Vf-VX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 08:06:28 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

When trying to use cdparanoia, I noticed the following:

$ ldd `which cdparanoia`

        linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff1e9dd000)
        libcdda_interface.so.0 => not found
        libcdda_paranoia.so.0 => not found
        libm.so.6 => /nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007fb37355b000)
        librt.so.1 => /nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib/librt.so.1 (0x00007fb373353000)
        libc.so.6 => /nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb372fa5000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fb372d89000)
        /nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb373877000)

The two missing libraries are part of the package itself; apparently, they
do not get encoded into the rpath. Could this be handled somehow by the build
system? Should it be done in the package definition? Or should I set an
LD_LIBRARY_PATH?

Andreas