From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id EOQXK5V/ImAqUAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:27:01 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id gDrnJpV/ImAELwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:27:01 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A5094053B for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9S6d-0002aJ-BY for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 07:26:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9S69-0002Zx-1G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 07:26:29 -0500 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:3595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9S64-0001lc-PH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 07:26:28 -0500 Received: from nijino.local (217-149-165-242.nat.highway.telekom.at [217.149.165.242]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DZhvb0VYHz1LBCm; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:26:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4DZhvb0VYHz1LBCm DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1612873579; bh=aU8s8m+fsTkGHnJ2604KxRaTOc04tjtoQpvqv22hxQU=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CYApx5dzlaZSAbI6GOlTpkagCI4Nh/nm8GHZ3iii0pE8qq1jUiyAme/TRstNpHBzc eSiwEFbAyRzNa/TkMeVFe/4salnV6aKOwQCyYG7JqVi1TYMogt3c2fUIpk2n6rhZsC Ucl/fpoLpCohyVsclbv+Ym21zv839dll/Gv2yx74= Message-ID: <1bd1a30d9c0e2d1c50e2c4402eca291b1999030f.camel@student.tugraz.at> Subject: Re: [DOUBT]: native-search-paths VS search-paths From: Leo Prikler To: Hartmut Goebel , guix-devel@gnu.org Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:26:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <80cb9703-154e-36ac-a4e9-ee2da9c9fb97@crazy-compilers.com> References: <726a227171fefad2ccd1240221d22c87da8657c5.camel@student.tugraz.at> <80cb9703-154e-36ac-a4e9-ee2da9c9fb97@crazy-compilers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.27.2.202; envelope-from=leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at; helo=mailrelay.tugraz.at X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=CYApx5dz; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=student.tugraz.at; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 74A5094053B X-Spam-Score: -2.49 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: Xl3VVhTdDNTA Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2021, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Hartmut Goebel: > Am 09.02.21 um 11:06 schrieb Leo Prikler: > > Depends on the package. If it gets propagated into the build > > environment, the variable is set as well. At other times, it might > > be > > set through the wrap phase for runtime purposes. > > This makes me think whether the wrap-phase of the qt-build-system > does > it right (even after 45784 is merged): It searches the "inputs" for > some > directories. This has the major drawback of including native-inputs > (most notable: cmake). It probably does some wrong things there. I'm also not sure if we can distinguish between inputs and native-inputs at this stage, since IIRC both get merged into %build-inputs, which is then passed as inputs. For a similar issue look at python packages built with meson – they likely retain a reference to meson as well. Regards, Leo