From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sirgazil Subject: Re: package requests Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:07:07 +0000 Message-ID: <171bc646374.b32988984370.2063073606534099294@zoho.com> References: <87eesbsojk.fsf@nckx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT6Hv-0001uW-Pv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:07:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT6Hv-0005bI-2C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:07:19 -0400 Received: from sender4-pp-o93.zoho.com ([136.143.188.93]:25393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT6Hu-0005av-Fe for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:07:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Catonano Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , guix-devel ---- On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 04:14:52 +0000 Catonano wrot= e ---- >=20 >=20 > Il giorno sab 25 apr 2020 alle ore 15:06 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ha scritto: > Hi Catonano, >=20 > Catonano =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > Say that some people file bugs in the Guix issue tracker=20 > > requesting the > > packaging of some software projects > > > > Can a list of such requests be seen in any way ? >=20 > [=E2=80=A6] >=20 > > Is there any specific tagging scheme to be used for package=20 > > requests filing ? >=20 > Not that I know of. It's all very ad-hoc and things get lost &=20 > forgotten. >=20 > is the closest=20 > thing we have to an =E2=80=98official=E2=80=99 list. >=20 > While a structured approach would be much better than our wiki=20 > page, I prefer that wiki page over *our* bug tracker. >=20 > don't you like Debbugs ? > I can see why > Have you seen this, anyway ? > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-03/msg00238.html > Sirgazil proposed to send a patch to allow Debbugs to tag package reques= ts so that they could be easily searched Not really patch Debbugs, but patch the website with proposed changes to ma= ke any list of requested packages visible (and add instructions to request = new packages). I still think Debbugs could be used for package requests, even if it doesn'= t support custom tags like "package request". One could instruct people to = send requests to bug-guix@gnu.org using a provided template. For example: Subject: [PACKAGE REQUEST] Add Some Software Body: Some other necessary information (website, license?) =20 Then, maybe link to issues.gnu.org with a query like this: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=3D%5BPACKAGE+REQUEST%5D+in%3Asub= ject+is%3Aopen (The in:subject filter doesn't exist, though).