From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia Subject: Re: guix import crate wraps #:cargo-inputs twice Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 10:39:44 +0200 Message-ID: <16beea18-f50f-836b-074c-9ab42539d3f9@riseup.net> References: <874l4ili56.fsf@web.de> <87y31isrhg.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhrqo-0002QF-9j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:39:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhrqn-00009D-Ak for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:39:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:58050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhrqn-00008G-5O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:39:49 -0400 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22311B93AB for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 01:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39F632230CB for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 01:39:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y31isrhg.fsf@web.de> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi arne On 2019-06-30 23:20, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi Ivan, >=20 >>> When using guix import crate flamer, it generates a pattern like >> Thanks for the report, I=E2=80=99ve fixed this in 022288ba53bd44c9311c= 6cffef5e8224a2e74598! >=20 > Thank you! >=20 > I=E2=80=99ve been working at getting a current Firefox packaged, but > got stuck now. If you=E2=80=99re interested I could send you all the ru= st how did you get stuck? > package definitions I created for that =E2=80=94 maybe you=E2=80=99ll s= pot the mistake > right-away. Unfortunately guix does not seem to handle duplicates well and chokes=20 with this unrelated it seems error when I add your packages to my list=20 without duplicates: See bug #36456