From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: raingloom Subject: Re: Wacom tablet issues Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 18:27:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1583429235.1586.3@riseup.net> References: <1583420028.1586.1@riseup.net> <20200305155218.zrwzv5cdwhnzwc67@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200305161011.ozrrusstowthqpoq@pelzflorian.localdomain> <1583424777.1586.2@riseup.net> <20200305172521.4afcosyclqnpjcub@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9uHM-0003I7-2k for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:27:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9uHK-00084M-Nn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:27:23 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:36120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9uHK-00083B-E9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:27:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200305172521.4afcosyclqnpjcub@pelzflorian.localdomain> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Well, udevadm shows it, but only as a single device instead of three. On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 18:25, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 05:12:57PM +0100, raingloom wrote: >> What about i3? Because that's what I used on all three distros. >> (also GNOME >> on Guix) > > i3 is not Wayland. Note that I only remember GTK people say it works > differently. What I said about Wayland is a possible reason why Arch > behaves differently if you used Wayland on Arch. In theory it should > be possible to make old xf86-input-wacom work too, I do not know how > and have no wacom tablet at hand. Then again, I do not know why > udevadm does not show the device. > > Regards, > Florian