From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Branson Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add systemd. Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 15:33:22 -0700 Message-ID: <1522794802.1880405.1325548648.335B896E@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20180401122259.9688-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87lge7f5ws.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9j2y9kd.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh8ebs06.fsf@fastmail.com> <87d0zhffz1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3UUY-0006nc-25 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:33:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3UUV-0002dF-Dp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:33:26 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:35663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3UUV-0002cx-65 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:33:23 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784502116B for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:33:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87d0zhffz1.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org So this isn't an april fools joke? guixSD may move to systemd? On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Marius Bakke skribis: >=20 > > Chris Marusich writes: > > > >> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> > >>> To be honest, while the Shepherd has been a fun hack, I=E2=80=99ve be= en more and > >>> more feeling that yeah, it wouldn=E2=80=99t cut it in the long term (= it=E2=80=99s also > >>> become clearer Scheme as convenient as C when it comes to systems > >>> programming and things like dealing with dependency graphs.) > >> > >> I think you may have forgotten some words. When you said "it=E2=80=99= s also > >> become clearer Scheme as convenient as C when it comes to systems > >> programming and things like dealing with dependency graphs", what did > >> you mean? > > > > I think Ludovic meant to convey "Scheme is NOT as convenient as C when > > it comes to ...", but made something of a "Kinsley Gaffe" since the > > opposite is obviously true. >=20 > Heheh. :-) >=20 > I was so excited by the announcement that my message was full of typos. >=20 > Ludo=E2=80=99. >=20