From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Griffin Subject: Re: [PATCH] add go@1.5 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:11:41 -0500 Message-ID: <1468296701.3946941.663559065.5D0B3A3F@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <87k2gtyrtj.fsf@guixsd-mailerver.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMp38-0002dA-Us for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:11:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMp35-00016u-Mb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:11:58 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:46697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMp33-00016C-AN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:11:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k2gtyrtj.fsf@guixsd-mailerver.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Matthew Jordan , guix-devel Can I ask why even package go 1.5? Upstream has committed to making sure all future compiler versions can bootstrap from go 1.4.x, so my thinking is that we only need to package two versions, go 1.4 and the latest version (1.6.2 at the moment). Or am I missing something? -- Alex Griffin On Sun, Jul 10, 2016, at 06:52 PM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > Good Day, > > Attached a patch to add go@1.5. I updated this one in a similar manner > to what was asked for go@1.4. However, let me know if any other changes > are required, or if I missed something. > > > Respectfully, > > --- > Matthew Jordan > Email had 1 attachment: > + 0001-gnu-Add-go-1.5.patch > 8k (text/x-patch)