From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id hiQ1HP683F4vCAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:10:06 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 8NrCF/683F4HeAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:10:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3164B94066A for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48532 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhsFh-0000tu-7B for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 06:10:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhsFV-0000tK-EZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 06:09:53 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:42827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhsFU-0002vr-CF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 06:09:53 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49fsZ56nz9z1qrfT; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:09:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49fsZ55LDDz1qqkg; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:09:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_NTzXrA2DmB; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:09:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermia.goebel-consult.de (ppp-188-174-58-95.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.58.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:09:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thisbe.goebel-consult.de (hermia.goebel-consult.de [192.168.110.7]) by hermia.goebel-consult.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6FB601D7; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:10:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add pEp (pretty Easy privacy) From: Hartmut Goebel References: To: Guix-devel , 41490@debbugs.gnu.org Organization: crazy-compilers.com Message-ID: <104c01de-853d-10b1-99cd-a13494eb55b1@crazy-compilers.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:09:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.18.0.9; envelope-from=h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/07 06:09:50 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: 5M/ETCX+87TM Hi Guix, I'm still seeking advice on how to name these packages. Shall I keep the names I'm currently using, or are there any other suggestions? Am 23.05.20 um 20:48 schrieb Hartmut Goebel: > This adds the build tools and libraries for pretty Easy Privacy, a library for > automatic key management and encryption of messages. > > How shall we name the packages here? > I'd appreciate feedback to the package names, since the original packages have > quiet uncommon names: > > - pEpEngine -> pep-engine (main library) > - libpEpAdapter -> intermediate layer library > - pEpPythonAdapter -> python-pep-adapter > - pEpJNIAdapter -> java-pep-adapter > > The project as other packages like these: > - pEpQtAdapter > - pEpJSONServerAdapter > - pEpObjCAdapter > > In Arch Linux AUR packages are named pep-engine, libpep-adapter, > python-pep-adapter, pep-jni-adapter, pep-qt-adapter. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |