From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id APa+GK39RWL2WQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:14:53 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id QK0pEa39RWKKGwAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:14:53 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E987E2E190 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:14:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54590 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1na0Fw-000452-3q for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 15:14:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1na0FS-00042U-K0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 15:14:22 -0400 Received: from [2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13] (port=46424 helo=baptiste.telenet-ops.be) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1na0FQ-0005FS-9Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 15:14:22 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id D7EG270084UW6Th017EGzR; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:14:16 +0200 Message-ID: <0fcc64bf008af471370e6704bffeb3c0174861be.camel@telenet.be> Subject: Re: Removing #:skip-build? from the crate importer? From: Maxime Devos To: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:14:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iRJ8ZN2Nh+04ubxxcs4h" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1648754057; bh=Ho+epn45Ny8Ioiw+usX0HqATm72jv2WfsvXnYZPunig=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=mmolbb9fncTyaHu2l0upuRx/+HCpGYSxn/GcSzLzj8rG8iob5OFtOFN5+/aUvWRAV LCXP44ck+WjW4EKvfsUxbj3ySR+zN8M9ezyzYpOhzNB7x61tFR5+sIqEy71JEfbqIm f1AxHKzI0F6cbC4QPNbY3lQiKtBNVnl5O99jjIJAAp0jL8OrSdbmBH05PTbb0XQDG4 0uFdQwtnxQd/3SNXHulZ3bAwL6ZlDPDgpnECCym/+IH3lLL3nu3PM8tjrahpJqhIXu 2LDbOHw+1KeUu3ryz/Vfzr9GP//OFrx4m5GgO0XIrufHQ2awpBcXauIVJu4zKj9mTo gNndj2QLlI7iw== X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=baptiste.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1648754093; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Ho+epn45Ny8Ioiw+usX0HqATm72jv2WfsvXnYZPunig=; b=lt4ztc/Qi9JCvwoiOFRbOJ6hGWlrWFoZrRCC2Co1tDV4/VRUpk6VIJRRL9bW+qYSbsVnRV mMNFD8HL/oEwqAZtQ+wdaoMK/uFgBJ3XUH73u9Zi7FjywcWaID5keUAv53MgzvRF7c+E4E /HmoQ42zzNi8rOMqmOJP3MWCIXHu4LDbP7ABh6joYfzUUYh3GPwp3roPbDqlRZvQJZU7KD s1mdu6/Kj7/gKrlSgAr4OxVlfa5tl0vRCcOP1IFb/B8/Y1xPLpI+0vGUTFO8Eqnhdxswn1 yPOIDvpUEWnUWoPGHU4Vfdb2RtGDpO/pzqHupFR2+ChN2fwaZv++KJus/d3/vw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1648754093; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UNmoYX6S4xJH+TVcWBb3ft5k99W2NHzsK2kuHyQhWdBNJ4PQzjX0UqRPXrHPx3Xn3Bqd+5 m0eJB0Ahps3HFH6sx/bFR5oR1yLS/IDooTT8a/0kGRlVu02Sga5z6rbbwF1GgZdL3A7rUj SCLDoLc5jYOFhXqS/1Tx7WoCnGSoqZ1wTWJubICvb2x9Xuky3II6E9OcM0InnOMVgGcQfF 5mJo5Z6HQwzt0/cVHS4PU/pO7h/VtNWtEj1KPGbqWfqkH5y+I0+SdgOvooq1xdAKEq/0Bu sPJt45Km78D/hzyl6CRdz8XPNjx/7lwll/S3B/foqt616GXgVVz/BUz+hz2eLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=telenet.be header.s=r22 header.b=mmolbb9f; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=telenet.be; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.27 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=telenet.be header.s=r22 header.b=mmolbb9f; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=telenet.be; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E987E2E190 X-Spam-Score: -5.27 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 5KC3EWdtB1Sx --=-iRJ8ZN2Nh+04ubxxcs4h Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op do 31-03-2022 om 21:07 [+0200]: > Hi Maxime, >=20 > similar discussions have been had in the past, but thanks for raising > them again.=C2=A0 As far as I'm aware, the "consensus" =E2=80=93 if it ca= n be called > such =E2=80=93 is that due to Rust packages often being a giant nothing b= urger > both in terms of what they actually do and in what can be used for > subsequent builds, but still generating a lot of hot air literally when > evaluated on CI, we ought to skip the build in intermediate packages. I was not aware that it has been discussed in the past ,thanks. > There are a few counter-proposals.=C2=A0 One suggestion that has been > raised, but not yet implemented, would be to make it so that build > results can actually be reused.=C2=A0 This is the most promising > conceptually, but from what I can gather from those working on it might > not be that easy to pull off. Yes, that would be nice. Are there already some concrete patches that can be tested? I know there are some (ideas for?) patches to move development-inputs->native-inputs but I don't think I've seen any patches for actually reusing build results yet ... Greetings, Maxime --=-iRJ8ZN2Nh+04ubxxcs4h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYkX9gRccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7v1bAQCnRnik8FqAjG9RtSU8tgUsBjKk JN+2d8FNHrUEa9uJ7QD/cVYmad4Zw1UiRhs/+vofzi08Fp6knX0CyQSo8ySAuws= =FsAU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iRJ8ZN2Nh+04ubxxcs4h--