From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id YKHZC5s56mQvYwEA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:42:51 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id YKHZC5s56mQvYwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:42:51 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EDA255C37 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:42:51 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=atYU1JEl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=disroot.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1693071771; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=fzRolmy/oPph5W3JGy6PT4SWqo0NCfdc9va/X9tuj+5krOw8I427QxlUAuCdMqTP77dxDG FV/+CX1+86bhj5JRv4uRhO2AtNXBYPgemONNCU6N1G1RKeBrq8Jb4i8Kji6RzVBbsCsa+7 cy/xanQpbIEjMXAQ3TtawlqneL0ozQL8DcRh/p5aAyqfi+WDc0ygy/7fUkQAJLifX3LeMn bT60cUlRMMG2//eID77gKuXkmwp4rGpdon8C2IX3729ob+3byHxv35gVG2jN4qTqA+Ho9t bvqYthe3keqTHQurGZMSsCBcdAtuQZLBlEHXblgL7ZqsBIp0pIpO/OC31nvRpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=atYU1JEl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=disroot.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1693071771; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Jvo699bhCakO1ZtQDIhSQ2IqwOGP7aig+Wk/Ac2pjgk=; b=lL2QfTFkhqLF2uPHSWJ4/cXMmkzdsPRo83gP4OQo/1IywHJLvabJ3RVT3ZL0j4WWVBS3eC BYKgnKil3uK0Ab/WeSr36bT10QKOSerB6rHr3h3MVldMMSJlk7pntTXlSHUcPeUf5mM0BU cu2R/JurLV9nrPU+yhlt2vuaKpHvH4FNsZ+/uYdMMhqe9UgsdxoUJfnLyudvYT2mV81bZo 0sNM5tNJBeVSItOjP/ciO5QXVgjGB3set4DXmE0oIMzW3GwwLtV6CkZcHUBzIfdaQgDItk kOf+L00yeo0yjyTjZcdoXbHcppBsqVfs7BC4aC+kc1Gi4s6oAEXSCF0Dr6pWaQ== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZxIl-0004Os-9i; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:42:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZxIj-0004Og-OT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:42:21 -0400 Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZxIh-0001Cg-Dt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:42:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E04441210; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:42:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ubbmi13MxOf9; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:42:13 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1693071733; bh=kzm3AI9PFHi8NsvPTXvAglGwzKxzaVZwbwE5XWCjGEs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=atYU1JElNRJdye0gAK58+zfdLaTdh3dnt2Ifc4qNyowqulrshdTjwZ3emY+kvHijB P2lC78K489JwEghzwahYJAKdAc/xL7kZTGSkI0YEKcMwPT9kc4BUilldFUXOWM25Os 8f2TotVbBMTDSHVHFZAKpqHB9yBsSj/LRcwa2qRw22fj76Uu7gS40ZIiRss+u6pZYB L4zzOajEXOxfHITLqKiAxvEuw0yq94V2YXhLlnh+Zquu9GRo6L9kqwBjWRIVWGi8zD rcc7YC/jsi3pfr2dHOdPZA1PSnxA1G0Y/E9wN4FAbPJJZqs9M4QL6gcJ6zKdlyEtjA 67fmJRcQV5/KQ== Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:42:13 +0200 From: kiasoc5@disroot.org To: Attila Lendvai Cc: Wilko Meyer , Katherine Cox-Buday , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? In-Reply-To: References: <8735084vv2.fsf@wmeyer.eu> Message-ID: <0e88ad722f88591d5e79da9793a2a64e@disroot.org> X-Sender: kiasoc5@disroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=kiasoc5@disroot.org; helo=layka.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -5.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0EDA255C37 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.39 X-TUID: Y1gbIsmA9uho On 2023-08-25 11:31, Attila Lendvai wrote: >> I feel like the advantages of a email-based workflow nowadays is more >> on >> the maintainer side of things (as managing large projects is easier > > > another thing worth pointing out here is that the harder it is to test > a submitted patchset locally, the fewer non-committer reviews will > happen. > > and if all the review work rests on the shoulders of the committers, > then there'll be long response times on submissions, or straight out > forgotten/ignored submissions (khm). especially if it's about some hw > or some sw that none of the committers care about, or could test > locally (e.g. Trezor support: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65037 that > doesn't even build in master). I would like to hear from committers if non-committer reviews are helpful, because I don't really know how or what I can comment on for incoming patches on packages I'm not really familiar with. Also do "this builds and works locally" comments help?