From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Robert Vollmert <rob@vllmrt.net>
Subject: Re: ci for wip-haskell-updates
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:52:11 +0200
Message-ID: <0C47EA64-6B3F-4737-B8D1-A6388C160852@vllmrt.net>
References: <B07BACFF-6BE3-45B6-982A-4B286544FA06@vllmrt.net>
 <87muh5dhax.fsf@elephly.net>
 <99509849-CFA2-4729-8FDC-D1A7798C73ED@vllmrt.net>
 <94456E8D-9AEF-4F47-9617-59773C853C64@vllmrt.net>
 <DEAAA11D-0C96-45E8-A519-55E28E584A6C@vllmrt.net> <87a7d2rp3r.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47493)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <rob@vllmrt.net>) id 1hspxs-0006pA-C8
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:52:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rob@vllmrt.net>) id 1hspxr-0008VR-D1
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:52:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a7d2rp3r.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On 25. Jul 2019, at 19:38, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Robert Vollmert <rob@vllmrt.net> skribis:
>=20
>>>> The current status of the evaluation of wip-haskell-updates is =
quite
>>>> confusing. There are a number of jobs listed as =E2=80=9CScheduled=E2=
=80=9D with a red
>>>> X mark at the front. Is this a bug?
>>>=20
>>> I think I found what causes this: Those jobs were actually in state
>>> =E2=80=9Cstarted=E2=80=9D, which fell through to failed.
>>>=20
>>> The patch below should complete the list, and make falling through
>>> noticeable:
>>=20
>> Apologies, I=E2=80=99d truncated the patch. A dedicated =E2=80=9Cstarte=
d=E2=80=9D icon would
>> be nice, too, but I didn=E2=80=99t find anything fitting in the font.

> Much better!
>=20
> Please push to cuirass.git (with a commit log).
>=20
> Thank you!

I extended the patch a bit, to fix some similar places. I couldn=E2=80=99t=
 test it
besides compiling, though. Submitted here:

http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D36874

Cheers
Robert