unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Christopher Howard <christopher@alaskasi.com>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>,
	Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>,
	Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions
	<gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Free firmware - A redefinition of the term and a new metric for it's measurement.
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:21:48 -0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <06cfad8d-0222-1c63-522d-013ecd2e6ce8@alaskasi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_immGW1dj0QnOROOZCuBbiMvN5R6c8JdsVq8QKcQZ1KLVCA@mail.gmail.com>



On 02/10/2017 08:31 AM, David Craven wrote:
> Hi Maxim
> 
>> +1. I don't see how having blobs helps security at all.
> 
> Well the problem I was getting at is that things are not as fixed as
> they may seem.
> Quoting wikipedia:
> 
>>> Decreasing cost of reprogrammable devices had almost eliminated the market for mask ROM by the year 2000.
> 
> Translation: ROM is not RO.
> 
> It is not a theoretical threat, and just as dangerous as other threats
> that people put a lot of effort in avoiding [0]
> 
> I don't see how trusting the manufacturer when buying the product is
> any different from trusting him down the road. I was talking about
> malicious third parties. Obviously planting something in difficult to
> upgrade persistent memory is a lucrative target for attackers -
> manipulating firmware becomes plain uninteresting in the other case.
> 
>> The companies that should be the rewarded are the ones that release
>> firmware, source code, and tool chain. E.g., Thinkpenguin and the TPE-R1100.
> 
>> Indeed, we ought to put our money where our mouth is, i.e. back the
>> companies which are helping the cause of free software/hardware.
> 
> I don't think they actually produce any silicon, toolchain or firmware
> themselves. At least I didn't find a link to it. So they are basically
> using other peoples silicon, toolchain and firmware. Giving them
> credit for complying with the GPL is not quite right either. (But I
> don't know who's behind the thinkpenguin and it looks like a great
> accomplishement).
> 
> To independently verify the claim that the firmware they are using is
> indeed fixed, would actually require them to release both schematics
> and datasheets of their designs.
> 
> [0] https://www.wired.com/2015/02/nsa-firmware-hacking/
> 

Stallman did an extensive article in 2015 which I think is relevant to
this discussion:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-hardware-designs.en.html

I don't have the schematics for TPE-R1100, though I think they would
send them if I asked. It is based on the AR9331 SoC which is quite open.
There was one other large chip on the board... I'll have to check what
that is after I get home.

-- 
Christopher Howard, Computer Assistant
Alaska Satellite Internet
3239 La Ree Way, Fairbanks, AK 99709
907-451-0088 or 888-396-5623 (toll free)
fax: 888-260-3584
mailto:christopher@alaskasi.com
http://www.alaskasatelliteinternet.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-10 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-03 14:37 Free firmware - A redefinition of the term and a new metric for it's measurement David Craven
2017-02-03 17:40 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
2017-02-03 18:18   ` David Craven
2017-02-03 18:44     ` Christopher Howard
2017-02-03 20:12       ` David Craven
2017-02-05 22:53       ` [GNU-linux-libre] " Maxim Cournoyer
2017-02-10 17:31         ` David Craven
2017-02-10 18:21           ` Christopher Howard [this message]
2017-02-13  7:02             ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-02-13  8:42               ` [GNU-linux-libre] " John Darrington
2017-02-13 19:24                 ` David Craven
2017-02-13 21:21                   ` [GNU-linux-libre] " Hartmut Goebel
2017-02-13 22:48                     ` David Craven
2017-02-14  6:55                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-02-14 10:41                     ` [GNU-linux-libre] " David Craven
2017-02-14 17:47                       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-02-14 12:15 ` Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
2017-02-14 18:43   ` [GNU-linux-libre] " David Craven
2017-02-14 20:11     ` Adonay Felipe Nogueira
2017-02-14 20:47       ` David Craven
2017-02-14 20:57         ` Christopher Howard
2017-02-14 21:01           ` David Craven
2017-02-14 21:13             ` [GNU-linux-libre] " David Craven
2017-02-20  7:50     ` Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
2017-02-21 12:15       ` David Craven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=06cfad8d-0222-1c63-522d-013ecd2e6ce8@alaskasi.com \
    --to=christopher@alaskasi.com \
    --cc=david@craven.ch \
    --cc=gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).