From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id WGTpJ9F83GE/1gAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:37:05 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id eC9/JNF83GFrfAEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:37:05 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48931291F4 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:37:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56968 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6zXT-0005yj-Vc for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:37:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6zX0-0005v4-7x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:36:34 -0500 Received: from [2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13] (port=47496 helo=baptiste.telenet-ops.be) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6zWx-0006ND-Nd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:36:33 -0500 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id h6cU260094UW6Th016cUtF; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:36:28 +0100 Message-ID: <03cbf268883ae93ae45b20e9ab8dee49ca5e7dd0.camel@telenet.be> Subject: Re: ImageMagick from 2020? From: Maxime Devos To: Timothy Sample , zimoun Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:36:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k0f71ndv.fsf@ngyro.com> References: <87tuebwlrc.fsf@gmail.com> <87k0f71ndv.fsf@ngyro.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2DnNU3Av3IE6RMMUOzmM" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1641839788; bh=HMQp37P6hf8Sa5yVHcsTXSPDkDgxOtYl0fjwB8JNUZA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=fCwI3gwDBKRgzSee52/0DyFh175TQ46wQLd68A6I+Xzmk+LAW9qyZvHVUpNRdOyt8 Q3iubGzYgcbDvK2BFh23x6rfz+HlaQmbiVmF/sLtYCG8+9Hh9AqKqBIveoeFXIsOCZ nzDCpDYgFEDO/7x9EyvAWrcsonwbJTtldOZsLZ7BFlFNbFP5TyKmXaquuyjSlS93uu VCXMcee5XZi1LHZdAQQEJuwtgt7d04P0RqMyyOzZCsoGCy16SGFDWSs48+WzuV3NBv UJ/kw8nGZGUQt6281JHSohBSntWGx3kkqe3VwuW3gUumEGnFTd7ffM+iRQyN5LbXfy KepW9qoOWIj3A== X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:120:4::f00:13; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=baptiste.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1641839825; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=HMQp37P6hf8Sa5yVHcsTXSPDkDgxOtYl0fjwB8JNUZA=; b=kgbqGq3VFzuts5lDzgTa7KjzQRy1lCRJ7Qztzv3ysdSrmw3qDThUNAm3CtMhRBuKReRjrP F4IxaEvvdOxx699o8cVCaDDru+f7kBdq+TDDm0Llr1f+xEj8NrWHv3Dja7I/tExPbdJjLD kCVmSM+BZguqEGzUyMKxngjsAUkgru6fiEsNHDCL7NhbQhsY5t2lTJAsU+OXmTBy19oYwP uEDg5g8Tc3+eBUG/g8EyH9DQvuSA3it5hdHcTZzXSyMPFYxZHxlaZ3yMAmwJbrow3cELnr E+2uu3Ky0d4tT9nf5UX/OHQhEfOvVjTsTx8LAsCB5Mi9sNcC5dCGq4MVMFBGlw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1641839825; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=uNjr4aA7hBL1Dq1BQTvx29Glc90lOd3nnd/bNVUDR87LJWNKq/CQS5viYPcBO/odTBcHK2 sslTUJtSPomqCdn30JzIJqX09NzEgoQce0xBJjwVb40vSUdR30DtGdUO+ualin14KsdThQ kvHZgxvNhcBPo0JX87dUQYOm0Zh9KqzEfi3wx55SManCJfywWAUyi129e7nCwhXAtQKrlA hGd78Lt+9BokDJuhJXva0IL+IyoSKi2XPfsyPo6Qxy7OuzJCrnMaAI+9Act8YIX/x9tSkA wtc8W5ZrEg54wtb1CPPtETfsod19MvDZJgXXua+tNMt0EqDWnna10h6KrE2FmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=telenet.be header.s=r22 header.b=fCwI3gwD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=telenet.be; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.71 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=telenet.be header.s=r22 header.b=fCwI3gwD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=telenet.be; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 48931291F4 X-Spam-Score: -6.71 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 5UkiRqPePHky --=-2DnNU3Av3IE6RMMUOzmM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Timothy Sample schreef op ma 10-01-2022 om 13:01 [-0500]: > Hi zimoun, >=20 > zimoun writes: >=20 > > We probably do not have this item. Since it is 'xz', it is somehow > > expected because it is works in progress. >=20 > XZ support is working in Disarchive now. I=E2=80=99m hosting quite a few= XZ > specifications at . >=20 > > Can someone confirm we do not effectively have this item in our infra? >=20 > According to my logs, I tried to get it a month ago and it failed then, > too. If you track it down, let me know and I=E2=80=99ll ingest it. =46rom repology, I found that CentOS c7 has ImageMagick 6.9.10-68: https://git.centos.org/rpms/ImageMagick/blob/c7/f/SPECS/ImageMagick.spec CentOS keeps its copy of the source code at https://git.centos.org/sources/ImageMagick/c7/ there are two files there, seems like they are named after some kind of hash? To determine the hash, you can look at https://git.centos.org/rpms/ImageMagick/blob/c7/f/.ImageMagick.metadata It's this file you need: https://git.centos.org/sources/ImageMagick/c7/ed27964d872abc81dc2388d333874= 766058a9b5d The hash checks out: guix download https://git.centos.org/sources/ImageMagick/c7/ed27964d872abc8= 1dc2388d333874766058a9b5d [downloading] 1jxjxhnvznpbdigry2cgxx94cx6k6y3rs40a464n5yln29s1qlz1 It might be interesting to teach (guix build download) to fallback to the archives of CentOS, Debian, ... Greetings, Maxime. --=-2DnNU3Av3IE6RMMUOzmM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYdx8phccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7sM5AQDB9hZcZibn0cx8hoD4vci8OXwx UmQQpsdJ4p2LoHZGVQD/RhkvLvA9JtvP4OmQyThDYk5i6a4IV/sWOZ/2zG4r2AE= =HOuY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2DnNU3Av3IE6RMMUOzmM--