From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iLGGCIj8+l9GDQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:09:28 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YLtYBIj8+l8LOwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:09:28 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66EBA9401C0 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49932 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyaTG-0002l5-CI for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 08:09:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyaT7-0002ku-2o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 08:09:17 -0500 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:4053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyaT0-0000GU-Nl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 08:09:16 -0500 Received: from nijino.local (217-149-169-137.nat.highway.telekom.at [217.149.169.137]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DDHGn5XBjz3wYf; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:09:05 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1610284146; bh=2ysY0QHzYDpnSnq/MyTSi7ZAQdlNs37HiVMnISz8+Fo=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=aVv7i98Dpg4Yl+n+j5sZd9JlCebw7KqBiafFi23M8X9qx5kQ/lY0IVrkY4T3Lm03N WJV91/+OTv5SpdHmoMi7hC8A25kbvr+ZBuYJ+jDWHtnFFNDhuo1RREcMJqGC/IyPJu Ft33Wf8CSceNN4yBQqJyLIBh8BI9PZEK3kySycY0= Message-ID: <00fda975a4dd79fbfc436d69461e5814ceb39426.camel@student.tugraz.at> Subject: Re: Add Microsoft Cascadia Code font? From: Leo Prikler To: Julien Lepiller , guix-devel@gnu.org, Yasuaki Kudo Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:09:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9897CE46-E860-4BB2-BA5D-B262709FF112@lepiller.eu> References: <0b59bd25f5683b371ca5ac0e940414b3f2d0c1c0.camel@student.tugraz.at> <74655A23-9280-40EC-AF10-524C727FCBFB@yasuaki.com> <5a04e459a00f1f8e6051d4ad7e77d4fd090fca7a.camel@student.tugraz.at> <9897CE46-E860-4BB2-BA5D-B262709FF112@lepiller.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.27.2.202; envelope-from=leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at; helo=mailrelay.tugraz.at X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.05 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=aVv7i98D; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=student.tugraz.at; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 66EBA9401C0 X-Spam-Score: -2.05 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 6qB18ZMsXXtE Hi Julien, Am Sonntag, den 10.01.2021, 07:28 -0500 schrieb Julien Lepiller: > I might be wrong, but I thought fonts were considered non-functional > data. If that's the case, isn't cc-by-nc-nd acceptable? Not according to the FSDG: > [Non-functional data] can be included in a free system distribution > as long as its license gives you permission to copy and redistribute, > both for commercial and non-commercial purposes. IIUC CC BY-ND would be covered if we indeed consider fonts to be non- functional data, but not CC BY-NC and certainly not CC BY-NC-ND. It goes on to list a hypothetical example of a game map, which is somewhat ironic, considering that games more often disqualify themselves for the FSDG through the use of entirely non-free assets or assets rather than being GPL-incompatible through the use of assets, that don't allow derivative work. Of course, the former is a subset of the latter, but the point I'm trying to make here, is that the latter is sadly not even a concern for many (aspiring) game devs out there. It also reminds me, that I have yet to code up a fully GPL/FSDG- compatible game myself – I'll get there some day, I promise. TL;DR: Non-functional data is fine if it is commercially verbatim- copyable. Regards, Leo